Foreword by Daniel Dennett. List of Contributors. Acknowledgements. 1. Introduction – Robert Aunger. 2. The memes’ eye view – Susan Blackmore. 3. Taking. Darwinizing Culture has 33 ratings and 6 reviews. Hakan said: Kitabı Alfa Yayınlarının Kültürün Darwincileşmesi: Memetik Biliminin Değerlendirmesi çevi. By applying biological theories and tools to cultural phenomena (e.g., cultural diversity, cultural revolutions), cultural evolutionists purport to make the study of.
|Published (Last):||25 February 2008|
|PDF File Size:||6.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Return to Book Page.
Jakob Klinkby rated it liked it Jan 22, Superbly edited by Robert Aunger, this is a thought provoking book that will fascinate, stimulate, and occasionally perhaps infuriate a broad range of readers including psychologists, biologists, philosophers, linguists, and anthropologists. Chapter 1 Introduction Robert Aunger. As Dennett reminds us on various occasions and topics, we must be prepared to, if not expect to, discover that accurate scientific theories are often counter-intuitive.
Darwinizing culture: The status of cultural evolutionary theory as a science
Our intuitions are not a good basis for building or refuting claims about the nature of our minds and the memes, as they lead us to overrate darwinizng conscious teleological control over our creativity or to engage in a semantic mapping between whole designs, ideas or theories and single memes. The genes constitute a recipe, not a blueprint.
cuulture In the past few years, there has been an explosion of interest in ‘memes’. Kristina rated it liked it Jul 18, I propose drwinizing two things should encourage us to operate under the assumption that Blackmore is right, and embark on the project of analyzing cultural designs within the memetic framework: These concepts may be straw men created by the early proponents of memetics like Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Geneand no wonder they are easily burned down by critics speaking in sarcastic tones.
Search my Subject Specializations: What makes us think that memes are much more simpler structures?
Rich Boulton rated it really liked it Apr 07, To ask other readers questions about Darwinizing Cultureplease sign up. Nov 22, Hakan Uzunlar rated it liked it Shelves: In this perspective, the general relativity theory is a memetic construct, resulting from the interactions of maybe thousands of memes that we may not readily map one-to-one onto the properties that we perceive and talk about on a semantic darwinising.
Print Save Cite Email Share.
Darwinizing Culture: the Status of Memetics as a Science by Robert Aunger
Hardcoverpages. Superbly edited by Robert Aunger, this is a thought provoking book that will fascinate, stimulate, and occasionally perhaps infuriate a broad range of readers including psychologists, biologists, philosophers, linguists, and anthropologists. This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords darwwinizing book and chapter level. Chapter 3 Taking memetics seriously: Jun 19, Joseph rated it really liked it.
Darwinizing Culture: the Status of Memetics as a Science
So it is my belief that memetics should — in the beginning, at least — shift its focus from human social behaviour towards human creativity and objects of culture, and do that with a more refined definition of meme to do justice to the complexity of the phenomena to be explained as well as to the memetic theory itself. Simply Rational Gerd Gigerenzer. Jun 06, Aldo Ojeda rated it liked it Shelves: Preview — Darwinizing Culture by Robert Aunger.
The memes’ eye view, Susan Blackmore 3. So why, when it comes to human social behaviour and psychology, leave this all behind and expect memetics to account for everything on its own?
Refresh and try again. The publication in of Susan Blackmore’s bestselling The Meme Machine re-awakened the debate over the highly controversial field of memetics. Memetics will be what we make it, David Hull 4.
With a forward by Daniel Dennett, and contributions form Dan Sperber, David Hll, Robert Boyd, Susan Blackmore, Henry Plotkin, and others, the result is a thrilling and challenging debate that will perhaps mark a turning point for the field, and for future research. Why yes, I do consider myself a memeticist, ever since I was introduced to it via Dawkins-Dennett-Blackmore.
A Very Short Introduction J. This simply is the essence of the memetic account of human creativity.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Conclusion, Robert Aunger Index.
An objection to the memetic approach to culture, Dan Sperber 9. With a forward by Daniel Dennett, and contributions form Dan Darwinixing, David Hll, Robert Boyd, Susan Blackmore, Henry Plotkin, and others, the result is a thrilling and challenging debate that will perhaps mark a turning point for the field, and for future research.