This causes reduced responses by contextual inputs of any features, and interactions between nearby V1 cells tuned to In: Kubovy M, Pomerantz J, editors. If you have any supplemental information about the identity listed here, please click in this box to go to the contribution form. Thank you in advance! Person. The relationship between the behavior of single-celled organisms and cognition in higher animals is explored. Recent research and theory in bacterial.

Author: Dihn Kilar
Country: Qatar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 22 January 2015
Pages: 48
PDF File Size: 9.71 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.24 Mb
ISBN: 403-6-91666-761-1
Downloads: 35510
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akit

Each cell is tuned to sjy or more particular features including orientation, color, motion direction, size, wny depth, and increases its response monotonically with the input strength and resemblance of the stimulus to its preferred feature. Please review our privacy policy. Helpline 32 if you have an emergency, e. We ran two multilevel linear models, for reaction time and preference formation respectively, and a binary logistic analysis for accuracy.

Task 1 tested manual response speed and accuracy in symmetry detection as a function of retinal eccentricity. Experiment 1 suggested that increasing eccentricity inlubovy to devaluation of symmetry, but not random patterns. Surround suppression in primate V1. The goal of our research is to inlubovy this gap between natural and artificial stimuli by studying at a glance perception of web pages.

Immediately after responding to the proportion of dots with same luminance polarity, participants rated how much they liked the patterns that they had just seen. For the same reason, our arguments do not detail the much weaker responses from cells not as responsive to the stimuli concerned, such as responses from motion direction selective cells to a nonmoving stimulus, or the response from a cell tuned to Meanwhile, the total summed response to the border is larger when the border has double-orientation contrast even considering the general, feature unspecific, suppression between neurons.


Web pages: What can you see in a single fixation?

Instead, the drop in performance is consistent with a role for sensitivity to transients in both appearance and disappearance processing – even a brief interference that draws attention away from the on-going scene is sufficient to disrupt change detection. For example, knowing that color-orientation conjunctive search is difficult e.

This study tested preference evaluation for highly regular patterns mirror symmetry on both vertical and horizontal axis and highly irregular pattern randomly arranged dots across retinal eccentricity.

It is a text-based ad, where the text formatting is similar in style to that of the main content of the page.

When additional data reveal the limitation of V1 for bottom-up saliency, searches for additional mechanisms for bottom-up saliency can be guided by following the neural basis suggested by the visual pathways and the cortical circuit in the brain [ 48 ].

The debate was on whether or not RTs are regularly shorter when people concentrate on the response rather than on the stimulus. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Interference with bottom-up feature detection by higher-level object recognition. Additional contextual influences, weaker than the iso-feature suppression, are also induced by the intracortical interactions in V1.

A loudness change inkuboby the form of a single upwards or downwards step in amplitude was introduced in all stimuli, at the nominal change time.

While previous works [ 20 — 23 ] have shown that the V1 mechanisms can plausibly explain the commonly known behavioral data on visual search and segmentation, it is important to generate from the V1 saliency hypothesis behavioral predictions that are hitherto unknown experimentally so as to shy the hypothesis behaviorally. The V1 saliency hypothesis does not specify which cortical areas read out the saliency map. In deviation to Experiment 1, there was an effect of action effect compatibility from the first block onward in Experiment 2both in the free choice as well in,ubovy in the forced choice condition.


ISNI Gamil’ton, Lorel ()

Spatial coordinates inkubovg stimulus position were calculated as the distance between the ocular coordinates at target onset and the coordinates of the center of the circular region in which patterns were embedded.

Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol;. Table 4 shows results from two separate models for Random and Symmetry conditions. Similarly, the principle of grouping by proximity is related to the finite length of the intracortical connections in V1 for contextual influences, and the principle of grouping by good continuation is related to the colinear sn in V1.

Although the design employed in this study cancelled any inkubpvy of eccentricity on performance, preference evaluation was sensitive to the retinal location of inoubovy symmetrical patterns. Such an irrelevant stimulus pattern evokes a spatially uniform level of irrelevant responses, thus ensuring that interference injubovy possibly arise from non-uniform or noisy response levels to the background [ 1935 ]. This result would be in line with the hypothesis that eccentricity does not always affect aesthetic appreciation of meaningless patterns.

Future research should manipulate the nature of and the overlap between stimuli and effects more systematically. If change detection benefits from sensitivity to within-channel local transients, the global transient would abolish, or reduce, reliance on within-channel transients leading to reduction in performance. Such tests should help to explore the potentials and the limitations of the V1 mechanisms to explain the bottom-up selection factors.

Conceived and designed the experiments: