A documented record of the Foundations of the Christian Religions. Contents include: Pagan Frauds – Christian Precedents; Hebrew Holy Forgeries; Christian . Joseph Wheless (Montgomery County, Tennessee ) was an American lawyer who According to Wheless not only had no one called Jesus ever lived, but Christianity and the Bible are based on deliberate fraud, Works. Is it God’s Word ; Debunking the Law of Moses ; Forgery in Christianity Forgery in Christianity has 13 ratings and 2 reviews. sologdin said: i really want to love this, but its ambitious argument is not well substantiated by.
|Published (Last):||4 July 2004|
|PDF File Size:||18.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
How accurate are the quotations in Wheless’ Forgery in Christianity?
These are presumably the numbers referred to in the contents pages though these are internally inconsistent! Aug 27, John rated it it was ok. Catholic Encyclopedia, “Life of St.
christoanity But yet if the option were proposed to the man who chose to burn incense to idols rather than yield his body to abominable lust, that, if he wished to avoid that, he should violate the fame of Christ by some lie; he would be most mad to do it.
Now, as to the just cause, Cultural Bias and Social Conditioning. The Logic of Miracles — Part 5: The Churches, the Federal Council of Churches, the Vicar of God and his adjutants, all ply amain the arts of enslaving the babe in the cradle, the child in the school. The same pope legislated severely against forgery and fodgery use of forged documents.
It is lawful then either to him that discourses, disputes, and preaches of things eternal, or to him that narrates or speaks of things temporal pertaining to edification of religion and piety, to conceal at fitting time whatever seems fit to be concealed: Matt Kelly marked it as to-read May 07, Naslund rated it it was amazing Aug 20, You are, no doubt, men of vast acquirements; but we too have studied in the schools, and, like you, we have learned from the precepts of Aristotle-or, rather, from those which he has derived from Gorgias-that there are different ways of speaking; and we know, among other things, that he who writes for display uses one style, and he who christiamity to convince, another.
He studied for the bar while articled in his uncle’s firm. Neglect of self-preservation leads to ruin and destruction. Hear Marcus Tullius, the subject of that noble eulogy: Refresh and try again. Like drunkards in their cups, they ejaculate now this, now that, when they ought rather to have avoided so serious a risk, and to have obtained salvation by simple faith, not denying the words of God.
As such, Wheless has imposed his own agenda onto a passage which is about something else. According to Wheless not only had no one called Jesus ever lived, but Christianity and the Bible are based on deliberate fraud, Christianity’s continued existence is a conspiracy using persecution and oppression to perpetuate its myths, to enslave people.
These are wholesome words from the perennial and living fountain. As a lawyer he defended American free-thinking and atheist organizations, was instructor in military jurisprudence chriwtianity the University of Arkansas and held the rank of major in the department of the Judge Advocate General. This tells us that Wheless did not verify his quotations. It is now easy to appreciate at its true value the influence of neo-Platonism upon the mind of the great African Doctor.
I stand in the thick of the fray, my life in constant danger: Wheless was an American judge; there are many honourable American rationalists in his book. Preview — Forgery in Whelexs by Joseph Wheless. In prohibition of which thing, Icomposed this book. If you have such books please contact us, we need to give them back to America.
Forgery in Christianity
However it is in fact a mistranslation of the Greek chapter title, which itself may not whleess authorial. Published March 15th by Cosimo Classics first published January 1st Thus travellers must be always armed and on the alert, and they must carry with them a whole year’s provisions.
Do you see the advantage of deceit?
In forgsry action of this kind ought not to be called deceit, but rather a kind of good management, cleverness and skill, capable of finding out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the mind. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
According to Wheless not only had no one called Jesus ever lived, but Christianity and the Bible are based on deliberate fraud, Christianity’s continued existence is a conspiracy using persecution and oppression to perpetuate its myths, to enslave people. We’ve all met the sort of ‘quote’ which is verbally accurate but so selected and arranged as to tell a fairy-story, if only in a TV documentary. He was son of Joseph Wheless Sr. In case of an apparent difference between faith and science, he takes the following logical position: One argues as one pleases, saying one thing while one means another.
The True Church lays down this amazing limitation on learning: Eusebius is not mentioned here.
Bonnes, Revue Benedictine 56 pp. The Logic of Miracles — Part 3: Maia Donachy marked it as to-read Jun 12, I will not use a severer word and so make myself like him or his followers, who presume at the peril of their soul to assert dogmatically whatever first comes into their headand to dictate to God, whereas they ought either to pray to Him or to learn the truth from Him.
Wheless stops his quote just before the sentence which whelses and explains it. Skepticism about Religion — Part 6: However I whelwss that a great many people presume that Wheless can be relied on for quotations from the Fathers. It is equally significant that “The Prince”, by Machiavelli, was published with papal licence, though afterwards severely prohibited.
His mother Myra McCall, died when he was young, and his brothers and forgegy were by whelesd father’s second wife. For the one got possession of the birthright, and the other transferred the wealth of the Egyptians to the host of the Israelites. Jordan Krueger marked it as to-read Dec 03, Christine Ezell marked it as to-read Oct 22, The same learned critic thus wisely concludes his study: Caritia Hughes rated it it was amazing May 14,